SIAD's spion-profiler og andre hystader på Facebook

Idag fik jeg af mandlige venner på Facebook nys om, at fake/spion-profiler søger kontakt igen, og disse findes jo i mange former. Der er ikke mange personlige statusopdateringer eller information på dem, udover folk, der spørger på Facebook-væggen, hvorfor personen anmodede om venskab. Det er allerede første tegn... Nogle af dem har kun 20 personer fra femten fra forskellige lande som venner. Andre har 2.000 venner fra hele Danmarks politiske spektrum, hvilket indikerer de ingen holdning har eller kun overvågende nysgerrighed.
Jeg selv er tidligere løbet ind i 3 lækre udenlandske tøser, der havde 10-30 venner fra hele verden, og som ville være venner med mig på Facebook for en måned siden. En tillod jeg indblik i mit "private rum" over et par dage, og slettede hende, da hun sendte mig en invitation til "Nej til Moskeer i Danmark"-gruppen. I, læserne, skal ikke anklage nogen af de nedenstående på screenshotsene, men vær vagtsomme...! To gange er det lykkes skribenten Max Uwe Jensen på www.sappho.dk at citere folk på nettet, selvom de troede, at det ikke var muligt. En af mine tidligere "venner" på Facebook blev udsat for det, og har nu forhåbentligt lært af det. Men vær allesammen vagtsomme. Fordi hvis I ikke vil citeres, så hold kæft, hvis offentligheden gør ondt.
Mvh, en medieluder.;)

To af disse nedenstående profiler, undtagens Anna Brandsen, søgte kontakt med mig idag. Men jeg er doven, så de fik ingen chance til at lære mig at kende... Men de er mystiske, da man enten er på Facebook for at møde gamle kendinge, eller nye venner. Og ikke for at være en holdningsløs korrekt nikkedukke med naive håb om småkager til alle i en sukkersød rundkreds. Man er privat, eller åben for det, man gider. Men her er de, som jeg ikke vil lege med:


Poul Hansen:

Anna Brandsen:

Cathy Fisher:



Men der er andre som bare ikke forstår, hvad Facebook kan betyde, når man tror sig sikker for alt. Tag nu hende, Sanne Skov Nielsen, der føler sig forurettet af folkene bag Bjarke WP Jensen's falske Facebook-profil, der nu på netavisen p77 afslører hende, og andre SIAD-medlemmers nedskrevne tanker. Hvis man siger noget til andre på Facebook, så må man fandme kunne stå inde for det! Men læs selv, hvad Susanne Skov Nielsen forventer af tredje del af føljetonen om Bjarke WP Jensen's undergrundsafsløringer på Facebook:

(Kommentaren lå på Bjarke WP Jensen's Facebook-væg her i nat, hvor Sanne før det har lagt flere kommentarer, men ikke har fået svar endnu...xD)

Kommer sex chatten op i del 3??? Voupti glæder mig! Tænker mere på det sidste jeg har skrevet til dig, at hvem brugte hvem, for at finde ud af hvem der var hvem og hvilken midler der bruges, for at finde ud af en person og hvad denne indeholder??
Du finder at kvinderne ikke har nær et had til Islam og finder det mere spændende, at komme med i lukkede grupper for spændingens skyld og anerkendelse af det lukkede netværk og social kontakt til mande typer de finder spændende.
Jeg slår det lige fast med 7 tommer søm. Alt hvad ideologien bag ved Islam indeholder tager jeg stærkt afstand fra! Synes simpelthen ikke, at dansk grundlov og Ideologien bag Islam hænger sammen!
Jeg indledte en chat samtale med dig, for at finde frem til dig og hvilken " Idiot " der kunne fremstå som meget aktivt i White pride og samtidig være venner med mig. En mørkglødet;-P
Jeg havde sat mig for at nå et mål og for at nå dette, måtte jeg lige som dig, fedte mig lidt ind;-P
Du kan godt tænke dig til, at når man har en mand, som jeg har, Thomas, vil jeg aldrig nogensinde kunne finde på, at lede efter anden kontakt. I hvert til fald ikke i en lukkede chat, så hellere åbentlyst. Det kaldes tillid!
Jeg selv er betalende medlem af SIAD og jeg har aldrig hørt om, at der skulle være racister blandt!Ved du egentlig, hvad racist står for? KIG DOG FORHELVEDE LIGE PÅ MIG!
Vagt værn??? Kender jeg overhovedet intet til? Det glæder jeg mig at høre mere om, for dette har jeg heller intet hørt om, at der skulle oprettes.
Omkring Carl Erik Zølck, har jeg personligt været hjemme og banke på hans dør. Det gjorde jeg da jeg opdagede han har taget nogle billeder af mig og lagt ud, uden der blev spurgt. Vidste faktisk ikke engang det var blevet taget og blev "mobset" over det er lagt ud på nettet, uden jeg har vidst, det fandtes.
Jeg ville hører ham fortælle hvorfor, at krænke mig på den måde.
Du sagde til mig jeg skulle passe på min børn, men gør i det lettere ved at lægge sådan et billede ud til offentligt skue??
Jeg har hverken haft rockerlign. typer eller nogen følge med mig.
Jeg er mig selv!
En ting er at der bliver taget billeder af mig og lagt ud, en anden ting er at de billeder overhovedet ikke kan relatere til demoen sidste år?
Kunne forstå, hvis der havde været et banner, hvor der stod SIAD på, men ikke engang det var der på.
Det bliver anmeldt på et tidspunkt til politiet, for finder mig sgu´ikke i, at man " bare" kan lægge alt muligt ud på nettet uden at blive spurgt først. Det kunne joh være jeg havde sagt ja! Har I tænkt på det???
Forøvrigt er jeg lesbisk!

Godt at vide, Sanne....XD



Nedenunder er der nogle screenshots af Sanne Skov Nielsen's kommentarer. Og helt nederste screenshots viser, at hun måske endelig fatter faren ved at lægge ting ud på Facebook? :

Anders Gravers digs his own tomb.............!

Anders Gravers (A paedophile racist) has put Carl Erik Zølck (A documentarist, who often writes about right wing politicians in Denmark)in his anonymous execution shed, followed by Zølck's adress and phone number, and lets it up to other fascistss to hunt C. E. Zølck down..... Gravers acts like a "powerful" man in public, but the truth is that he only is a impotent moocher, who lives off other people's work, grobing on his neighbours kids and since he doesn't contribute to the common society, he gets welfare for doing nothing at all!!!. Instead of having a honest job, he spends his time playing master of execution in cyberspace.
But two can play this game...!



On the wordpress-site of SIAD (Stop the Islamisation of Denmark), you can read this:

"On Saturday the 9th of February we received a letter from the Copenhagen Police, Investigation Department at Amager, signed by to persons unknown to us, Mr. Finn Chr. Christiansen, police solicitor, and John Amdisen, vice police inspector. In their letter they informed us that in pursuance of Section 749(2) of the Administration of Justice Act they had decided to stop the investigation of the attack on SIAD in the parking cellar in Wildersgade.
So much for the impressing words of the Minister of Justice stating that the police are still working on the case, and that they do not smile on this kind of attacks.

What makes us particularly angry is that a couple of smashed office windows at the Enhedslisten (political extreme left wing party) led to the establishment of a special investigation department which had to decide whether or not it was a politically motivated attack and to find the guilty, whereas the resent assault on SIAD with intent to kill is only being classified as brutal violence and not as an assault with intent to kill. Add to this that only one official burdened already with a pile of cases to solve was put on our case.

Actually, we had given the police good information about those behind the attack and about the person who had drawn us into an ambush. During the attack this person was absent for 5 minutes. Everything points to his guilt. We have made our own interrogations of the persons present at the event and almost everybody is telling the same thing unless the person strongly suspected.

In the meanwhile, a person called Tage from the police intelligence service (PET) told us that he had sent on our information to the Copenhagen police. It was not a kind of information which would have led directly to the detention of someone, but it contained some details which might have served as basis for further investigations. This information was never received by the investigator at the Amager police department! Very mysterious.

It ought to be found out what caused the mistake. Does PET not speak the truth or has someone at the Copenhagen police headquarters decided to let the information disappear?

- Also the conditions about the demonstration in Holland are very mysterious.

From the beginning the Dutch police had promised Anders Gravers their protection during the demonstration, recently held in Amsterdam in corporation with SIOE Holland, because the police had learned about the attack on Anders Gravers.
When Anders Gravers asked Tage from the Danish police what had happened to the information about the attack on SIAD, Tage began to talk about the demonstration in Holland reminding Anders and the other SIAD members to be careful in Amsterdam. Anders then told Tage that they had been granted protection by the Dutch police.

During the following conversation between Anders Gravers and the Dutch police the latter wanted to speak to PET about the attack and perhaps a need for further protection during the demonstration. The Dutch police got Tage’s telephone number.

On the day of the demonstration a place to meet with the Dutch police after the arrival of the SIAD members in Amsterdam had to be arranged.
However, when Anders Gravers contacted the Dutch police he learned that the protection had been annulled because the police had been told by PET that there would be no need for protection. Suddenly the police saw no major danger in Anders Graver’s participation in the demonstration in Amsterdam.
Protection was granted, however, but this was not owing to PET, only due to SIOE in Holland.

Below we shall mention all the mysterious events:

1) The police knew that the left wing gangs would try to stop the demonstration in Copenhagen but they did not inform the persons in charge of the arrangement. The police had even prepared a sector patrolling to prevent problems.

2) The silence of the press about the attacks and the assaults with intent to kill, and the lies and concealment of the events by Rizau focusing on detentions of some demonstrators wearing teeth protection, but not one word about assaults with intent to kill.

3) In spite of stab marks on clothes and safety vests, the case is not upgraded from brutal violence to assaults with intent to kill.

4) It is our opinion that the police will never confront the principal suspect with his insufficient explanations and information which are inconsistent with those of the rest of the group. Neither will he be asked about the cart to the parking house which he suddenly found.

5) The information that never reached the investigator but disappeared due to PET.

6) The Minister of Justice ensures in her answer to Søren Krarup (MP) that something is really being done about the case, but at the same time the case is dropped by the police.

All these items lead inevitably to some questions.

One thing can be said with certainly: Something in the system is rotten, either it lies with the police or PET, but there are some indications that both are involved.

Why do neither the police nor PET take a firm grip on our principal suspect? It rather seems as if he is being protected. Is he a PET man? We know that PET has agent provocateurs as seen in the terror case from Vollsmose.

If he is a PET man is he then their contact to the left wing gangs? In the affirmative is it then possible that PET wants to force us to silence, and that the attack of the left wing gangs was becoming to
their ends, i.e. they did not do anything to stop the gangs although they knew about what was going on.

Why does PET urge the Dutch police to drop the protection of Anders Gravers by telling them that his participation in the SIOE demonstration in Amsterdam would not cause any danger?

Why do the police classify the crime committed against the SIAD members as brutal violence and not as an assault with intent to kill? Is this in order to down grade the importance of the case and thus prevent it from being unravelled? Most normal people will probably see stab with knives in the stomach and hard blows with iron tubes in the head as assaults with intent to kill.

Why do the police only put one man on the case, even someone who is already buried in work? When Anders Gravers calls him a couple of months after the attack he tells Anders that he almost never works on the case anymore due to lack of time.

One thing is for sure: Every attack on SIAD makes us even more firm to stop the islamisation of Denmark. However, we shall of course take note of the fact that there is no support from the official Denmark, and we shall act accordingly."

Lies and furthermore badly written lies, who do not make it right to threaten C. E. Zølck!
Anti-fascists should send Zølck some hommage or best wishes, because all this man has done, is to draw the true names of nazies into the open.

And now to Anders Gravers. Here ar some pages about him....:

www.antidenmark.wordpress.com

www.facebook.com/anders.gravers

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_the_Islamification_of_Europe


State your verbal hate in any way against this mentally limp diaper wearing whore of SIOE (Stop Islamification Of Europe), who don't only violently pursue moslems, but also jews, africans, asians and eastern european people as well....

More to come about this wanking tosser and his danish idol poster of the pig whore Pia Kjærsgaard in the cellar, trust me!

www.undallslund.wordpress.com